Creating a wormhole by colliding black holes

///THIS IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION, WORK IN PROGRESS AND ALL THAT e.g. images (and probably common sense) are missing and terms/concepts are mixed up etc. And if the gravity is always perpendicular against the fabric (which would explain why everything has their own gravitational pull), and that defines the shape of the universe, then this whole thing is kinda useless.///

Disclaimer: I do not own the universe (probably). If you try making a wormhole based on this and fail, remember that you got this stuff from the internet..

If you succeed, though, then I might have some claims.. So arbitrary rights reserved..? The point is: don't come blaming me if you make a mess or unmake all the messes ever.

Information and entertainment purposes only.

So let's assume that the universe is a bubble. Why bubble? Well everything else in kind of like a bubble(a sphere!).

(image from Wikipedia)

[air bubble underwater image]

[atom image]

[honey comb structure(sharing walls with other bubbles = hexagons) image]

[honey comb layered on top of each other will form a cube image]

[Earth image]

Nature just loves to arrange itself into a sphere or a bubble. But this is kinda like 4th or (some other)-th dimensional bubble

Now when we see this:

Where the gravitation is like a pressure against a fabric or a rubber film, and the space is bent.

What if to achieve a wormhole you didn't have to bend space?

What if it's a matter aligning immensely heavy object to collide with another head on?

(image from Reddit, whoever used it there has the responsibility of distributing stuff.. God I hate arbitrary things like copyrights, how can one own anything? Everything used to make things are mined from this planet and the brain is kept running with the food gathered from this planet, so how can anyone have any claim on anything? Yeah I don't bother checking how they work.. Someone let me know if I've dun goofed, I have no intention of hurting anyone)

To achieve the shape on this depiction of a wormhole you can't be pressing the rubber surface on just one side, you'd have to press it from both sides.

(image from telegraph.co.uk)

Now apply that idea to a ball, bubble or a balloon, and let's assume the balloon
wouldn't pop, You'd have press it from the exact
opposite sides of the balloon to make those two points collide head on, to make the forces fully cancel each other out.

Now there could be some sort of explosion or some sort of spectacle while those forces fight to stay in existence, and that may have some "collateral damage" hopefully tearing a hole in the aforementioned rubber fabric of space and at the same time welding the edges of the two opposite holes together.

Since they both are like rubber they'd be pulling to the opposite directions keeping the wormhole stable. Since the black holes are gone, there would be no spaghettification when entering the wormhole. And I think it's crucial that the collision (and the created "gravitational tunnel") is made head on and not from an angle(maybe there's some tolerance), because when the two black holes cancel each other out, the fabric will try to "surface" because there won't be anything pressing against the fabric.

If the thing we refer to as a black hole, is just an immensely heavy "object" sinking through the fabric of the universe, then I don't think that black holes are as nearly as interesting as the force pulling it. What is it sinking towards? And since apparently(to my limited knowledge) everything has gravitational force, then there must be a source for that, something that grants everything that attribute, an absolute weight that everything is measured against, and the closer to that weight an object is, the deeper and closer to that point it sinks.*


I think I've read or heard somewhere the two black holes colliding just makes a bigger black hole, but I think the calculations where done to a situation like this:

When the two holes and the event horizons meet, they'll add to each other.

As you can see the black holes are sinking towards the "maximum weight" which is depicted to be in the middle of the sphere, so the objects around the universe have the same "mass gain distance" to the center. To connect the two black holes without sinking to the center, you would have to move "gravitationally sideways" which isn't a dimension of gravity anymore in this case. You would need the assistance of another dimension, which would apparently be, in this depiction, from the first three(x,y,z) dimensions. So you'd have to actually travel through it, just like in the movies, the travel miles saved are paid in increase of weight, since you'd still be moving towards the center of the gravitation bubble. To think of that, maybe the spaghettification would still be a problem. Or maybe the gravitational core always tries to align itself a certain distance away from the fabric. If not, the whole thing could at least partially collapse on itself, after losing the weight of those black holes keeping the thing "submerged".

(I should have done the models with "ico spheres" instead of the "normal" ones, which made the thing look kinda funny.)

Now there are few things with this theory: If the universe is an ever growing 4th dimensional bubble, where is the 4th dimensional horizon? How is observed? Is it the threshold set by the speed of light(!!??); just like the commonly known horizon it's ever evading and out of reach. And even if you find the horizon and could calculate the size of this 4th dimensional bubble, how would you know the locations of black holes on the opposite side if there's even any?

If the "gravitational weight" or mass is something pulling planets and stars against the fabric, and the universe was a bubble or a balloon, the point where everything is pulled towards would be the center of universe, the big bang origin point; where the bubble started to expand. And to achieve this wormhole, you would have go through the gravitational center, the thing that is pulling EVERYTHING against the fabric of space. Maybe it aligns itself around the created tunnel?

If the fabric of the universe acted like rubber, the fabric could tighten thus lightening gravity. The balloon bubble universe would make the universe a somewhat limited, although possibly ever growing. This growth rate is something to take into consideration when calculating the position of the opposite side black hole, but that's why we have Newton's Calculus.

Another thing to consider is that if the bubble was to burst for some reason, what happens when there's nothing to stop us from getting pulled to the center of the universe? Would it create another universe to the opposite "direction", like an inverse universe? No worries though, this probably doesn't happen as long we feel/observe gravity, meaning that the rubber surface hasn't yet stretched near to its breaking point, but if it gets punctured by something that's another thing.. But what would such thing even be? Or what if the universe was already tunneled through; what if it's a shape of torus and the accelerated growth of the universe is just the surface texture nearing to pass through the center hole, which is a smaller diameter than the outside circumference, causing a Venturi effect of sorts? Are we eventually heading for a black hole, that being the tightest spot to "squeeze" through; center of the aforementioned torus?

Another thought: What if gravity doesn't warp time, but IS time? Or the other way around? Although the "time" we use for measuring, is movement compared against other movement (e.g. a second is"the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom").

And when the flaming and bashing starts, just bare in mind that I don't actually know if all this is already old news or debunked beyond stupidity, I'm no scientist, and I woke up to this thought this morning, and I really don't have any idea if this is stupid or not, just wanted to share.

*(Could we create a model where all the known absolutes/constants are, and where everything else is "sinking" in relation to those absolutes/constants? Without it being this very reality, of course.)

//Oh, and IF I got something very top secret accidentally right by some unfathomable miracle, could you not assassinate me or do anything that I would deem unpleasant. Or at least consult me first.